After becoming the youngest manager since Mancini to win a Serie A title in 2011 with AC Milan (later surpassed by Conte), and experiencing the golden five-year period with Juventus from 2014 to 2019—during which he won five league titles, two Italian Super Cups, and four Italian Cups—Max Allegri is now undergoing an unprecedented decline. Welcomed back to Juventus a year and a half ago as a saviour, expected to begin a new winning cycle, he is today regarded as the main (and by some, the sole) culprit of Juventus’s failure.

This article aims to explore one of the reasons for this decline, focusing less on his lack of tactical innovation and more on the communicative aspect. Indeed, these two years of inactivity have revealed a completely different man. The confident, convincing, almost cocky attitude he once displayed in press conferences has been replaced by a man who is evidently confused, weakened, and lacking certainty. Perhaps this is because the team bears little resemblance to what he envisioned at the end of the transfer market, or perhaps because he has become imprisoned by the structure he himself built over the years. He has long championed an extremely simplified, almost banal approach to football, often in opposition to the “theorists” of the game, yet always bolstered by solid foundations of consistent victories. Now, as soon as those victories are absent, the entire edifice crumbles miserably, leaving him to fight a battle that has become more philosophical than tactical, one which has gradually eroded his personality.

He now appears as a lost man, one who has lost the joy of his profession and has transmitted this sense of disheartenment to his players, who have regressed and become resigned. It is hard to remember a time when Allegri complained about his players, found constant excuses—chief among them injuries—and failed to acknowledge failure. Even his greatest strength, his ability to adapt to any situation and to bring out the best in his players, seems to have been lost.

Further exacerbating this situation is an intense environment in which winning, especially in recent years, has become the norm. Additionally, it is well known that in football, fans often prioritise emotions and immediate feelings over rationality and objectivity, placing high-profile figures on a constant rollercoaster where one day they are heroes, and the next, failures. Carlo Ancelotti went through a similar process, considered finished after his time at Napoli and Everton, only to lead Real Madrid to European glory within a year and reclaim his legendary status.

Ultimately, however, the field, as always, will give the final answer. Time will tell if Allegri has the strength and skills needed to overturn a situation that seems already defined.

By Andrea Dapavo

About a month ago, as many are now aware, the All England Club, organiser of Wimbledon, made the drastic decision to ban all Russian and Belarusian players from the tournament as a strong statement against the war in Ukraine (a stance strongly encouraged by the London government for political reasons). Recently, the ATP circuit responded by announcing that points earned by players during the tournament will not count towards the rankings, while points from the previous edition will effectively be removed.

The ATP justified this decision on its official channels: “The ability for players of any nationality to compete in tournaments solely based on merit and without discrimination is fundamental to our circuit. The decision to exclude Russians and Belarusians undermines this principle and the integrity of the ATP rankings, and contravenes our agreement on the ranking mechanism.”

Subsequently, the WTA, which governs the women’s circuit, made a similar announcement.

Therefore, the 2022 Wimbledon tournament, scheduled from 27 June to 10 July, will be effectively a sports exhibition, having no impact on rankings.

However, the All England Club, which has described the ATP’s decision as “disproportionate,” is likely to appeal, with support from the other three Grand Slams (Australian Open, French Open, and US Open).

The latter have not enacted the same measures against Russian and Belarusian players, yet, together with Wimbledon, form the four most prestigious tournaments in the world, potentially risking significant reputational damage should one of them lose competitive significance during a season.

In the worst-case scenario, the appeal could lead to a serious rift between the Slams and the circuits, with the former potentially establishing a parallel ranking system to the ATP and WTA.

This situation feels familiar, evoking the Super League controversy that recently shook the football world.

However, the appeal has yet to be formally submitted, and one of the ATP’s additional arguments – that players could simply have been admitted as neutrals – adds further complexity to how this matter might unfold.

At present, barring unexpected developments, the 2022 edition of Wimbledon, the oldest tennis event in the world, could end up carrying less value than a Challenger.

By Gianluca Zaghis